分享
2016年10月24日23:41 中国网

分享

  社论:贾敬龙应暂缓执行死刑

  近日河北贾敬龙杀人案核准死刑引发争议,多位法学界学者与律师呼吁,贾敬龙罪不至死。案件的起因和贾敬龙自首的认定是影响量刑的两大因素,而从这两项因素看,贾敬龙案具有法定从轻理由。

  英文原文:Doubts over death sentence should delay its execution

  A gavel in a court。 [Photo/IC]

  Jia Jinglong is to be executed anytime soon, after he and his attorney were reportedly informed of the Supreme People‘s Court’s approval of his death sentence。

  We are not in the position to call a halt。 Yet we feel strongly that the order must not be carried out。 Not because social media are rife with cries against the ruling。 But because the circumstances are anything but normal, and there are some outstanding questions that need to be properly answered。 Legal experts, from professors to lawyers, deem the sentence problematic。

  Jia shot and killed the head of his village in 2013, and he was convicted of murder。 His death sentence is controversial, though, for the murder was a reaction to the ruthless, illicit forced demolition of his home that the victim allegedly masterminded。

  Legal professionals have argued that Jia qualifies for a lesser sentence, a reprieve for instance, as he tried to turn himself in and confess to police afterwards。

  Considering both the judicial authorities‘ new emphasis on prudence in applying the death penalty, and the reasonable doubts surrounding the sentence, we urge the court to demonstrate discretion, and avoid the double tragedy to which we are dangerously close。

  Whatever happens, Jia‘s case should not be allowed to slip away as if it were just another regular criminal offense。 Because it is not。 Outside the courtroom, there are pricey lessons to be learnt。

  “I am a victim。。。from the very beginning,” Jia told the first-instance court in self-defense。 “I would not have embarked on such a road of no return had there been a way out。”

  The murder took place months after his home was demolished by force。 He called the police in the vain hope of stopping the demolition。 He tried to negotiate for compensation afterwards。 He lodged complaints to local authorities。 He found himself helpless, hopeless, with no way to have justice done。

  As in many similar cases, Jia used to be an ordinary citizen concerned primarily about living a normal life。 Like others who ended up desperate, vengeful and hurting themselves and others to have their injustices noticed, Jia would probably not have acted as he did if his loss had been properly taken care of。

  When residents are victimized by those who have power in their hand, they should not be deprived of the hope of having their wrongs addressed and justice delivered。

  来源:中国日报

责任编辑:乔雷华 SN098

相关阅读

从新政看出租车公司囚徒困境

中国的传统出租车行业实行所谓公司制管理,长期以来豢养了一大批既得利益者,他们成为出租车行业在信息化时代试图转型的最大障碍。

美国眼里的菲律宾总统

菲律宾总统杜特尔特真让美国头痛。尤其是前几天还声称要“与美国分手”,引起不少媒体注意。也是“几家欢乐几家愁”。

自由反抗民主:特朗普的战争

过去的美国总统选战,只是两个人之间的竞争,是两党的竞争,这一次美国总统选战,已经变成了一场自由和民主之间的战争。

时代的烙印就像屁股上盖的戳

如果没有这种价值观,我们说不清楚为什么能坚持几十年、为什么能幸存下来。

  • 中菲搁置南海争议日本真急了??
  • 小偷直播盗窃,观众咋没人报警?
  • 中途岛战役美国为什么胜得如此惊险?
  • 刘慈欣:拿到诺贝尔文学奖人生就毁了
  • 驴得水这部零差评电影到底是什么鬼?
  • 男友说他是处男,但他总想我陪他过夜
  • 冲绳:那霸购物不完全攻略(图)
  • 新浪首页 我要评论 分享文章 回到顶部
    0